Il giorno Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:53:21 +0100 Nico Golde <nico@ngolde.de> ha scritto: > Hi David, Hi Nico, > * David Paleino <d.paleino@gmail.com> [2008-02-12 14:50]: > [...] > > I usually sign all my emails -- but when I include commands to the BTS I > > cannot do that, as the GPG header is "confusing" the server. > > > > So, this is how you would do it. I add more to the original question: is it > > possible to send GPG-signed mails to control@b.d.o? > > What problems did you experience? Cause I sign all my mails > no matter if they go to the control address or not and never > had any problem with that. To be honest, last time I tried sending a signed mail to control@ was something like a year ago. Something may have changed since then, since I've just made a "test mail" (see #455005). But I've also changed something: now I send my GPG signature as "PGP/MIME", before I was sending it as "PGP/Inline". I bet that control@ can't handle PGP/Inline signed messages. Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature