On 11/02/2008, Andres Mejia wrote: > Perhaps it's best to include where the description and other > information should go. I'm thinking something like: > […] > The package appears to be lintian clean. I'd like not to see this in a template anymore. And rather a “State of the package with the latest lintian version available (in unstable):”, reminding people that this is not just a sentence to copy over, and that one has to actually run lintian… > The upload would fix these bugs: XXXXXX . . . Maybe suggesting to include a description and/or the severity of the bugs might help spot “important” uploads. > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/package/package_version.dsc That URL is IMHO very sufficient. > Reason: This is a new upstream. It fixes a security issue that > allowed this and that. etc. . . . That might be a nice summary instead of just a list of bugs, titles, severities as I proposed above, but the idea is just the same. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois
Attachment:
pgpdEL1plf6Vh.pgp
Description: PGP signature