Il giorno Sat, 9 Feb 2008 10:45:48 +0100 Luca Bruno <lucab@debian.org> ha scritto: > David Paleino scrisse: > > > I decided to use your suggestion as the version number, with revision > > number 1 (i.e. "0.99.ds1-2"), because it's the first release with the > > repackaged source. And, IMHO, it's better than the "+ds" thing. > > I'd say that this isn't a great idea. If in the future upstream release > a micro revision, eg 0.99.1, you'll be in trouble as 0.99.1 isn't > greater than your 0.99.ds1. Please compare these: > > dpkg --compare-versions 0.99.1 gt 0.99.ds1 && echo OK > dpkg --compare-versions 0.99.1 gt 0.99+ds1 && echo OK You're right. Thanks for noticing this :) http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libx86/libx86_0.99+ds1-1.dsc Ciao, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature