Il giorno Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:38:15 +0100 David Paleino <d.paleino@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > ... > > Well. 0.99-2 because the archive already has 0.99-1. The "+ds1" part means > that it has been repackaged ("Debian Source"), and 1... well, I didn't like > 0.99-2+ds ;) > > ... > > 0.5.2.1.ds-1.1 > 4.57~ds.1-1 > 2.3.0+ds1-1 Now, after some reasoning, I believe that I should use something like "0.99+ds-1", (or "0.99~ds-1", but it results to be lesser than 0.99-1). Any suggestion on what versioning scheme to adopt? (obviously not 0.99~ds-1, since it wouldn't supersede the version in the archive) Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature