Il giorno Fri, 8 Feb 2008 08:38:43 +0530 Kapil Hari Paranjape <kapil@imsc.res.in> ha scritto: > Good work. I will examine your package tonight (about 12 hours from > now) and tell convey any further suggestions. Thank you, > Meanwhile, could you explain the logic behind the version number 0.99-2+ds1. > (I suppose one could also look up policy on this but I'm being lazy!) Well. 0.99-2 because the archive already has 0.99-1. The "+ds1" part means that it has been repackaged ("Debian Source"), and 1... well, I didn't like 0.99-2+ds ;) I've looked the Policy, but probably I missed it, and it doesn't explain what version number to use in case of a repackaged source. I've seen lots of versions (results taken from apt-cache dumpavail with some grepping): 0.5.2.1.ds-1.1 4.57~ds.1-1 2.3.0+ds1-1 I think I shouldn't use "dfsg" either, because it's not been repackaged because of non-free things or the like :) Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature