On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 08:07:45PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/pkgs.html#t-p-u [1] > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/09/msg00000.html [2] Ok, I understand the theory according to [1]. But [2] states that bugs should be at severity critical, grave or serious, and I'm not convinced this bug merits being above normal, in the context of [3]. It doesn't really have a major effect on usability, it's just really ugly. However, [2] also says that uploads will also be considered for bugs in packages of priority optional or extra when this can be done via unstable. Can you explain this a little more clearly? I don't /think/ it applies, because my testing and unstable packages are dissimilar, but it's not easy to tell. Do you think it is severe enough to be put forward for lenny? Cheers [3] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities -- Jonathan Wiltshire
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature