Re: licencing doubts about APT
2008/11/8 Andre Felipe Machado <andremachado@techforce.com.br>:
> From 15 November 2000, the Qt licensing was not used anymore, but should
> it be left there from a potential liability for an old version?
Could you elborate on why you think that "it [should] be left there
from a potential liability for an old version", because I cannot see
any reason why the text should be included...
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_.
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?
Reply to: