Hello, Please, help me to understand the bug report [0]. From 15 November 2000, the Qt licensing was not used anymore, but should it be left there from a potential liability for an old version? I guess that the copyright file should be left as is, registering the conditions at time line. What is the correct approach? Regards Andre Felipe Machado [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=440049
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E9?= uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente