Robert Wohlrab wrote:
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 22:45:38 Reijo Tomperi wrote:Robert Wohlrab wrote:- watch file is missing (see uscan man page for sourceforge examples)Added (I hope it is correct, at least uscan from program's folder did not give any errors.Looks good. You can test it by running `uscan --report --debug`
Seems to work, it was able to find all old versions and identify current version correctly.
Never ever change the source code in the diff.- Daniels name has non-utf8 encoding in FileLister.cpp, FileLister.h and testtokenize.cpp (upstream issue)Fixed ( I will try to get this fixed on the upstream also)
Reverted back.
- clean doesn't remove autogenerated cppcheck.1FixedYou can use `dh_clean cppcheck.1` to remove this file instead of using rm.
Thanks, I was looking for that. Fixed
You should try to use one to keep track of different versions and branches (stable, testing, unstable and maybe special ubuntu branches). There are different helper packages for that `apt-cache search -n buildpackage`. It is not a must or should. I've just noticed that decentralised vcs works just fine for that.- Vcs-((Git|SVN|..)|Browser) is missing in control. If you use a vcs to manage your debian package - please add these.I'm not using, but I have submitted the man page to the upstream so it can be found from there.
Sounds like a good advice, I will need to investigate that later. I'm thinking about using git as it has pretty good support for branches. But if I use only local git, do I need to or should I edit the control file? If so what exactly am I supposed to put there?
- the correct link to GPL-2 (for your manpage) on debian systems is /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2 and not /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL which links currently to GPL-3The example in the wiki-page you provided to me use the same target for GPL-2+ license as I did ( I also have version 2 or later there): http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat#head-f4f1796c2acee38a5362a 3f7fa26860623f28a4b Is there perhaps an error in the wiki? For now I left it like it was mentioned in the wiki.Good question... Maybe someone else on this ml has a opinion on that.It is correct. Every new release should increment the debian revision. It can be found in the policy under 5.6.12I hope I did the right thing when I changed the version number from 1.25-1 to 1-25-2. I couldn't find much information about what to do after getting first feedback.- There are typos inside the changelog s/andn/and/, s/xsltprc/xsltproc/ - "*-stamp is not removed by target" is wrong. It will be removed by dh_clean which is inside the target.
Fixed these also The updated package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.25-3.dsc
Thanks again for your time. - Reijo