David Paleino scrisse: > I decided to use your suggestion as the version number, with revision > number 1 (i.e. "0.99.ds1-2"), because it's the first release with the > repackaged source. And, IMHO, it's better than the "+ds" thing. I'd say that this isn't a great idea. If in the future upstream release a micro revision, eg 0.99.1, you'll be in trouble as 0.99.1 isn't greater than your 0.99.ds1. Please compare these: dpkg --compare-versions 0.99.1 gt 0.99.ds1 && echo OK dpkg --compare-versions 0.99.1 gt 0.99+ds1 && echo OK > Kindly, > David Cheers, Luca -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Luca Bruno : :' : The Universal O.S. | lucab (AT) debian.org `. `'` | GPG Key ID: 3BFB9FB3 `- http://www.debian.org | Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Attachment:
pgpOC70BCdn9o.pgp
Description: PGP signature