Il giorno Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:38:15 +0100
David Paleino <d.paleino@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
> ...
>
> Well. 0.99-2 because the archive already has 0.99-1. The "+ds1" part means
> that it has been repackaged ("Debian Source"), and 1... well, I didn't like
> 0.99-2+ds ;)
>
> ...
>
> 0.5.2.1.ds-1.1
> 4.57~ds.1-1
> 2.3.0+ds1-1
Now, after some reasoning, I believe that I should use something like
"0.99+ds-1", (or "0.99~ds-1", but it results to be lesser than 0.99-1).
Any suggestion on what versioning scheme to adopt? (obviously not 0.99~ds-1,
since it wouldn't supersede the version in the archive)
Kindly,
David
--
. ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
: :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
`. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page
`- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature