Re: RFS: ladr and prover9-manual (updated package)
>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Collingbourne <pcc03@doc.ic.ac.uk> writes:
Peter> Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my packages
Peter> "ladr" and "prover9-manual" (I am packaging the
Peter> documentation separately because upstream distributes it in
Peter> a separate tarball).
I am not even close to a DD, so don't get your hopes up, but maybe
some discussion helps. I am tangentially interested in provers.
0) Both packages build in a sid pbuilder for me, hurrah!
1) lintian will now complain about standards version 3.7.2 as being
old
2) I didn't really understand why you use
cp -a bin/* debian/tmp/usr/bin
instead of dh_install or something.
libtool --mode=install cp -a ladr/libladr.la `pwd`/debian/tmp/usr/lib
also struck me as being a pretty opaque way to install a library.
Your milage may vary.
3) Your man pages could be improved. I guess you know that, since at
least you have stubs. You might find the script help2man helpful,
Something like
help2man -h-help rewriter > rewriter.1
gets you a file that requires only light editing.
4) I think some simple examples in /usr/share/doc would be motivating
for someone trying the package out (in particular sponsors).
Yeah, well I wish I could complain about more lintian warnings, but
obviously you're aware of lintian :-)
David
Reply to: