On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:14:50 +0100 Romain Beauxis <toots@rastageeks.org> wrote: > Again, I for myself recommend cdbs for simple packages since you are > then sure not to forgot any dh_* call (yes, I know you may call > uneeded ones but...) and reduce your rule only to the relevant > parts... But this is of course not an official guideline, just *my* > advice that others sponsors may not tell. > > Romain :-) Another sponsor who likes CDBS! Careful, we could start a trend . . The CDBS patch system has to be simplest one of any available for Debian. One line in debian/rules, drop the patch into debian/patches, no fussing with 00list, no fussing with existing makefile rules. Ideal - let the patch do the talking. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
pgpP7pvybpWYt.pgp
Description: PGP signature