Re: RFS: php-html-progress2
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 01:02:08PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Christoph Haas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 03:42:55PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "php-html-progress2".
> >> * Package name : php-html-progress2
> >> Version : 2.3.0-1
> >> Upstream Author : Laurent Laville <email@example.com>
> >> * URL : http://download.pear.php.net/package/HTML_Progress2
> > This URL gives a 404. I believe you mean
> > http://pear.php.net/package/HTML_Progress2
> Yes, I did. Sorry for the mistake.
> > The URL seems to be mentioned correctly within the package though so no
> > need to worry.
> > What's worse: you install some files into the
> > /usr/share/doc/php-html-progres2 directory ('s' instead of 'ss').
> Ouuups! This is now corrected, sorry I should have check more. It's
> reuploaded at the same location:
> > I mainly hesitate to offer myself as a sponsor because I have a slight
> > dislike for CDBS. ;)
> My previous sponsor thought it was better this way, so I changed to this
> type of package.
Seems to be a common issue among DDs that there is no agreement on
whether CDBS or Debhelper should be used. I for one prefer Debhelper but
for very simple packages also accept CDBS. There are strangely other DDs
who seem to force package maintainers to rewrite the rules files to
CDBS. I don't understand that really.
Package is uploaded.
Peer review means that you can feel better because someone else
missed the problem, too.