[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Change in my sponsorship requirements



also sprach Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org> [2007.07.15.1133 +0200]:
> I think it is about time that I changed the way I handle one element of
> my sponsoring: I think that trying to retain the same Debian version
> during the entire sponsorship process is prone to error and teaches bad
> habits. In future, I think it is easier for everyone if every change
> during sponsorship gets a new Debian version, so if you need me to
> sponsor packages, each upload to mentors.debian.net must use a new
> Debian version. The simplest way to do that is with 'dch -i' and then a
> comment about what was fixed in this upload. This is how the Debian
> archive expects everyone to handle debian/changelog so this is what I
> should encourage during sponsoring.

I agree and I usually adopt the same procedure, except I make use of
the new ~ character in version strings. Even more my own packages,
I'll release

  1.0-1~unreleased.1
  1.0-1~unreleased.2
  1.0-1~unreleased.3

until it's final and I can release 1.0-1, for which I merge the
previous changelog entries. This is more work and requires more
recompiles, but it does the job without cluttering the changelog.

I encourage others to do the same (or something similar).

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
i must confess, I was born at a very early age.
                                                       -- groucho marx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Reply to: