[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: command-not-found



Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:08:47PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "command-not-found".
>>
>> * Package name    : command-not-found
>>   Version         : 0.2.4+debian-1
>>   Upstream Author : Zygmunt Krynicki <zkrynicki@gmail.com>
>>                     Michael Vogt <michael.vogt@ubuntu.com>
>> * URL             : https://launchpad.net/command-not-found
>> * License         : GPL
>>   Section         : admin
> 
> Not sure. Perhaps "shell" as a section might match better.
> 
>> It builds these binary packages:
>> command-not-found - Suggest installation of packages in interactive bash sessions
>> command-not-found-data - Set of data files for command-not-found
> 
> I just built and installed it. There is some funny whitespace in between
> the messages:
> 
> ===============================
> $ inetd
> Command 'inetd' is available in '/usr/sbin/inetd'
> The command could not be located because '/usr/sbin' is not i ncluded in the PATH environment variable.
> This is most likely caused by the lack of administ rative priviledges associated with your user account.
> bash: inetd: command not found
> ===============================
> 
> i ncluded -> included
> administ rative -> administrative
> priviledges -> privileges
Fixed.

> 
> Did you talk to the Ubuntu maintainer already? Perhaps it make sense to
> join forces so that only one package is built?
He's CCed, so: mvo: What's your opinion?

-- 
Julian Andres Klode

IRC Nickname:   juliank (Debian/OFTC + Freenode)
Fellow of FSFE: https://www.fsfe.org/en/fellows/jak (No. 1049)
Debian Wiki:    http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode
Ubuntu Wiki:    http://wiki.ubuntu.com/JulianAndresKlode
In Launchpad:   https://launchpad.net/~juliank
Packages Overv: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=jak@jak-linux.org
Languages:      German, English, [bit French]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: