Re: RFS: bazaar-webserve
I am resending this request as I have had no response yet.
I saw recently that the package may be rejected if the changed-by date
is too old in the upload. If the date seems like that might apply I
would of course be happy to update it.
On (07/01/07 17:57), James Westby wrote:
> Dear mentors,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bazaar-webserve".
> * Package name : bazaar-webserve
> Version : 0.11-1
> Upstream Author : Goffredo Baroncelli
> * URL : http://goffredo-baroncelli.homelinux.net/bazaar-dev
> * License : GPL
> Section : web
> It builds these binary packages:
> bazaar-webserve - allow a bzr branch to be accessed via the Web
> The package is almost lintian clean. There are two wanings about odd
> permissions on the cgi scripts. They are shipped 0754 root:www-data and
> lintian says that they might as well be 0755. I'm wasn't entirely
> convinced so I went with the slightly stricter permissions.
> I comaintain the package with Arnuad (on Cc:).
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bazaar-webserve
> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free
> - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bazaar-webserve/bazaar-webserve_0.11-1.dsc
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
> Could the package also be built with -v0 so that the complete changelog
> can be included and the ITP bug closed. This package spent quite a long
> time packaged but not uploaded, but has been available publically. If a
> potential sponsor would prefer a different arrangement please let me
> Kind regards
> James Westby
> James Westby -- GPG Key ID: B577FE13 -- http://jameswestby.net/
> seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
James Westby -- GPG Key ID: B577FE13 -- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256