[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: softbeep (updated package)

On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 00:08 +0100, Florent Rougon wrote:
> > IMHO, this is something that makes and two non-equal
> > Policy versions. I wonder why wasn't this instead?
> Hmmm... maybe because the "should" in was actually obviously a
> "must" for security reasons?

Exactly... since it's plain stupid to have these files world-writable,
it is a "bug" in the text that it was not written that way, not a change
of what you should do. You should already not make these world-writable
of course.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: