On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 08:20:25PM +0000, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote: > Osamu Aoki wrote: > >Also have you checked current Qt shipped with Debian is compatible with > >scim-qtimm. Last time I checked about a year or so ago, Qt nneeded > >patch to use scim-qtimm. > > Debian's Qt3 have patched the Qt immodule since version 3.3.5-4(Feb 23, > 2006). All Qt3 immodules work great and are quite stable. [1] > > >How are you going to integrate this with current im-switch structure. > > Did you add English Debian specific README.Debian for install guide. > > Qt3 immodule can work with current im-switch smoothly. > Default setting may auto-detect the existence of Qt3 immodule, and > enable it whenever users launch X. [2] > > Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > > I think that was the same patch skim needed and it is in place. The > > question is, is scim-qtimm relevant now there is skim? > > Scim-qtimm and scim-bridge-cleint-qt can work with scim or skim. > In fact, skim also can work without Qt3 immodule. It may use XIM without > problem. > > Wen-Yen Chuang (caleb) > > [1] Etch's gcin-qt3-immodule and uim-qt have supported Qt3 immodule. > > [2] For example, gcin's im-switch script enables Qt3 immodule > automatically, when it found libqgcin.so. If the user remove > gcin-qt3-immodule, then XIM will be used as the fallback default. > Maybe we can set this in scim's conffile for im-switch, then it can use scim-qtimm/scim-bridge-client-qt automatically, according to guys install any of them, if they haven't install any, then it will use xim defaultly. > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-REQUEST@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmaster@lists.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature