[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: meep



Daniel Baumann <daniel <at> debian.org> writes:
> Loic Le Guyader wrote:
> > The package is lintian clean. But I have problem with the -dev packages. They
> > are empty and I don't understand why.
> 
> it wasn't empty here.

Damn, for me dpkg -c libmeep-mpi-dev_0.10-1_all.deb 
drwxr-xr-x root/root         0 2006-11-19 18:36 ./
drwxr-xr-x root/root         0 2006-11-19 18:36 ./usr/
drwxr-xr-x root/root         0 2006-11-19 18:36 ./usr/share/
drwxr-xr-x root/root         0 2006-11-19 18:36 ./usr/share/doc/
drwxr-xr-x root/root         0 2006-11-19 18:36 ./usr/share/doc/libmeep-mpi-dev/
-rw-r--r-- root/root      1425 2006-11-19 17:48
./usr/share/doc/libmeep-mpi-dev/copyright
-rw-r--r-- root/root       174 2006-11-19 17:48
./usr/share/doc/libmeep-mpi-dev/changelog.Debian.gz

and the same for libmeep-dev_0.10-1_all.deb and I don't see why.

>   * can't find the build-dep libharminv-dev, where did you get that
>     from?

>From here
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=harminv

I also posted an RFS on debian.devel.mentors for it. The thread is here
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.mentors/21708/focus=21708

I also have one on libctl
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.mentors/21717/focus=21717

I updated those packages also according to your current comments.

>   * this is ugly:
> #! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run

That's from dpatch. I corrected but maybe we should fill a bug report for that.

>   * debian/rules:
>     - if you include dpatch.make, you don't need to define the dpatch
>       targes, look at cdrdao on how to make it right.

Well, it work like this so I prefer to not change it.
 
Thanks for your report. 

The corrected packages can be found there:
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=harminv
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=meep
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=libctl



Reply to: