Re: When is it "official" that a license has changed?

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: When is it "official" that a license has changed?
From: "Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso" <jordigh@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 18:19:52 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 9543b3a40610151619o511fbe72o3e5edf11e782c5b9@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20061015230410.GL3663@volo.donarmstrong.com>
References: <[🔎] 9543b3a40610151554u55bccde3yd376feed56b1e8f2@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20061015230410.GL3663@volo.donarmstrong.com>

On 15/10/06, Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> wrote:

but so long as they've sent some sort
of message which obviously originated from the copyright holder
(signed, or something else)


"Something else"?

- Jordi G. H.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: When is it "official" that a license has changed?
  - From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>

References:
- When is it "official" that a license has changed?
  - From: "Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso" <jordigh@gmail.com>
- Re: When is it "official" that a license has changed?
  - From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: When is it "official" that a license has changed?
Next by Date: Re: When is it "official" that a license has changed?
Previous by thread: Re: When is it "official" that a license has changed?
Next by thread: Re: When is it "official" that a license has changed?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread