[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: anaconda



Op di, 12-09-2006 te 23:36 -0700, schreef Ryan Finnie:
> On 9/12/06, Carlo Segre <segre@iit.edu> wrote:
> >
> > I noticed that you first filed the ITP in June.  Since then, we have had a
> > python transition to 2.4 and there is a new standard for python packaging.
> > Th python2.X-package type packages are no longer the norm.  You will need
> > to convert your package to either python-central or python-support.
> 
> The wiki docs made it rather easy to understand and convert over to a
> unified python package, but I need a small clarification.  Since my
> python package provides only public extensions (no .py modules), I do
> not need to reference python-support/python-central, correct?
> python-support/python-central are needed only for bytecompilation of
> modules?
> 
> Also, since I already uploaded to mentors.debian.net, I will have to
> bump the revision from 11.1.0.50-1 to 11.1.0.50-2.  -1's changelog
> entry is "Initial release (Closes: #376187)" (the ITP), but since -1
> never actually made it to incoming, what is the procedure for making
> sure the eventual upload will close the ITP?  Should I put "Initial
> release (Closes: #376187)" again in the changelog for -2?  Remove -1's
> changelog entry completely?
No, do not modify your earlier changelog. To close the ITP during upload
your sponsor can rebuild the package with -v11.1.0.50-0 argument to
dpkg-buildpackage. This will make sure your the changelog of -1 and -2
is included it the changes file used during upload.

Greetings Arjan 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend


Reply to: