Op za, 02-09-2006 te 20:41 +0200, schreef Christoph Haas: > On Saturday 02 September 2006 20:19, Patrick Ruckstuhl wrote: > > >>> - please do not remove old debian/changelog entries. You already > > >>> closed the bug reports in the 0.7.2 version > > >> > > >> I thought because the package was rejected it is still the first > > >> upload (and therefore the first changelog entry with the closes). > > >> After the package is in debian it's clear to keep (and extend) the > > >> changelog. > > > > > > Basically you are right. I'm just a member of the "don't fake the > > > revision"-club. Some people insist that a Debian package's revision > > > must be "-1" to be uploaded. However often a package takes a few tries > > > until it's released so a revision can become 1.0-7 which is no problem > > > at all. I'm just comparing previous packages with newer packages and > > > wonder why debian/changelog entries disappear magically. > > > > So does the bts look at all changelog entries? Not only the latest > > (and would therefore not close the bug)? > > You got me. I believe only bugs are closed in the BTS that are listed in > the most current changelog entry because that's what makes it into the > source control file during the upload. > look at the -v flag of dpkg-buildpackage. From the manpage: -vversion In dpkg-buildpackage, dpkg-genchanges and dpkg-parsechangelog this causes changelog information from all versions strictly later than version to be used. Greetings Arjan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend