On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 08:27:34AM +0200, Frank B. Brokken wrote: Hi Frank, nice to see you here. :-) What you say is correct, but I want to change the wording a bit to avoid confusion: > You'll find examples of that in all debian library packages. It's not very > different from making a binary package. The change I'm making is "a binary package" -> "any other binary package". What Debian calls a "binary package" is the thing that gets installed by the user, independent of what's in it. It usually ends in .deb (or .udeb for installer binary packages). There are two kinds of packages, "binary" and "source". So even a pure documentation package with only text files in it is called a "binary package". The library packages you talk about are binary packages as well (and of course they also have a source package). Thanks, Bas Wijnen -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://129.125.47.90/e-mail.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature