Re: pbuilder on sarge
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 01:21:18PM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Steve Langasek <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > I have found that it is easier to have machines running each distro
> > > you want to build against, but it shouldn't be neccessary. Try a
> > > "--distribution etch" though; something that builds under etch should still
> > > run under sid.
> > And no, you should *not* build against an etch chroot if the intent is to
> > upload to unstable.
> I only did this before because of the weird 'tar' problems in
> unstable... What's bad about building a package out of testing?
Dependencies are broken (which is allowed in unstable), but it
probably confuses britney.