Hi Alexander, first, thanks very much for uploading. On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 03:24:11PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > * Franz Pletz <fpletz@franz-pletz.org> [060625 14:36]: > > * Package name : gplanarity > > Version : 11496-1 > > Damn, forgot one remark: > You use the svn revision as version number. I don't think it's a good > idea to use it this way: > - the user can't see, that it's "just" an svn-snapshot > - if upstream does a real release, you would need to use an epoch Well, upstream does in fact "really" release but uses the revision as version number, so I thought I should stick with it. True, if there a 0.x or 1.x release an epoch has to be used but I think it's nevertheless justified. However, if it against some policy I don't know of, can and should we get it out of NEW? Cheers, Franz -- Franz Pletz \ Lots of the basis of the open source movement www: http://franz-pletz.org/ \ come from procrastinating students. email: fpletz@franz-pletz.org \ -- Andrew Tridgell
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature