[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: gplanarity



Hi!

* Franz Pletz <fpletz@franz-pletz.org> [060628 00:59]:

> Well, upstream does in fact "really" release but uses the revision as
> version number, so I thought I should stick with it. True, if there a
> 0.x or 1.x release an epoch has to be used but I think it's nevertheless
> justified.

Oh, okay, missed that ;)
No, I take that back then.  If upstream release it this way, you should
stick with his verioning scheme.


> However, if it against some policy I don't know of, can and should we get
> it out of NEW?

If I thought it should get it in, I wouldn't have uploade it ;)


Yours sincerely,
  Alexander

-- 
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: