Re: Naming conventions for mingw32 packages?
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 01:51:52PM +0100, Volker Grabsch wrote:
> Dear Debian Mentors,
> The zlib development package in Debian is called:
> While I do understand the "1", I don't understand the "g".
> In particular, should I adopt that naming convention for
> mingw32 cross builds?
Probably to track the Debian zlib "native" package.
> Sorry for my questions, but there isn't any "Debian MinGW
> Policy" out there, is it?
:) I almost hope not.