On 24-Aug-2005, Justin Pryzby wrote: > Just to be clear, a proper copyright notice looks like "Copyright > (C) 2004, 2005 Justin Pryzby", possibly omitting the "(C)". Definitely omitting the "(C)"; there's no legal purpose for "parenthesis letter-C parenthesis". If you want a copyright symbol, the only symbol recognised legally for that purpose is ©, encoded in Unicode as U+00A9 COPYRIGHT SIGN. Thus, these are both useful: Copyright 2004, 2005 Ben Finney Copyright © 2004, 2005 Ben Finney IANAL, TINLA, YMMV, HAND. > The problem is that dh_make used to give a ./debian/copyright of the > form: "Copyright: <boilerplate here>", and lots of people changed it > to "Copyright: GPL.", confusing "copyright" and "license". I have a > large number of opened bugs [0] about current packages whose > /u/s/d/x/copyright looks like that. > > dh_make now [1] uses "Copyright Holder: <boilerplate>" to make the > difference more clear. Which still isn't fully clear, since my instinct at that point is to put only the name, and not the copyright notice. I agree, though, that this is better than putting a license name where a copyright notice is required. -- \ "Writing a book is like washing an elephant: there no good | `\ place to begin or end, and it's hard to keep track of what | _o__) you've already covered." -- Anonymous | Ben Finney <ben@benfinney.id.au>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature