Re: Please take a look over aspell-ro_0.50-2-1
Eddy Petrişor <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On 10/5/05, Brian Nelson <email@example.com> wrote:
>> Christoph Berg <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> > you might want to use the new "Archticture: all" packaging variant,
>> > see for example #319675, otherwise you need to Provides:
>> > aspell6-dictionary
>> aspell6a-dictionary, actually (dictionary file locations moved after the
>> sarge release).
> so I need either "Architecture: all" or Provides: aspell6a-dictionary ?
You need either:
The former is strongly preferred, provided you use the
aspell-autobuildhash system properly.
> I looked over the bug specified, but there are some unclear things to
> me. How should I provide a gzipped version or the word list? If I gzip
> it before packaging then the diff.gz will be huge, right? (As the
> original package does not have a compressed word list.)
Include them just in the .deb at build time, and not in the source
package (.diff.gz). See aspell-en, for example.
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.