Re: Please take a look over aspell-ro_0.50-2-1
On 10/5/05, Brian Nelson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Christoph Berg <email@example.com> writes:
> > Re: Eddy Petrişor in <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> >> Could somebody take a look over it and tell me if I need to make any
> >> changes before I list it on sponsors.d.n ?
> > changelog:
> > remove the [ ] part
> > get an ITP and insert it here
not done yet, as I want to have the package fully prepared, then I
want to upload it.
> > control:
> > old Standards-Version
bumped, no change needed
> > you might want to use the new "Archticture: all" packaging variant,
> > see for example #319675, otherwise you need to Provides:
> > aspell6-dictionary
> aspell6a-dictionary, actually (dictionary file locations moved after the
> sarge release).
so I need either "Architecture: all" or Provides: aspell6a-dictionary ?
I looked over the bug specified, but there are some unclear things to
me. How should I provide a gzipped version or the word list? If I gzip
it before packaging then the diff.gz will be huge, right? (As the
original package does not have a compressed word list.)
(Will get to the next ones when I arrive at home.)
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein