Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > Quoting Damyan Ivanov <divanov@creditreform.bg>: > >> While dropping dpatch is unthinkable for me (it helps a great deal when >> reviewing diff.gz for unwanted changes), documenting its usage in >> README.Debian >> is indeed a very good idea. > > Except that README.Debian is not the place for something like that. > Only things > relevant to the *user* of the package should go there. Things like what > build > system are used or what additional development tools are user belong in > another > README that can be put only in the source package but not the binary > package. I agree. In fact the README in question is named debian/README.dpatch and is not included in any binary packages. Just as you suggested. dam -- Damyan Ivanov Creditreform Bulgaria divanov@creditreform.bg http://www.creditreform.bg/ phone: +359(2)928-2611, 929-3993 fax: +359(2)920-0994 mob. +359(88)856-6067 dam@jabber.minus273.org/Gaim
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature