Hello *, On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 09:45:01PM +0200, Claudio Moratti wrote: > On Thursday 06 October 2005 20:35, Florian Ernst wrote: > > Last I heard I still thought I was going to sponsor this, see our mail > > exchange around Message-ID: <20050915235845.GL16180@ernst.uni-hd.de>. > I remember that message :D > > My answers were: > [...] Yes, I have read that mail. > > However, as you hadn't dealt with all the issues I mentioned in that > > mail (like e.g. your orig.tar.gz unnecessarily differing from upstream's > > tarball) I didn't push you any further, thinking you were still > > working on this and you'd get in contact again once you were done... > I fixed the problem with differences between original traball and > orig.tar.gz... > > I download it from http://opensource.bureau-cornavin.com/keurocalc/ > extract it and my orig.tar.gz in two different folders and > diff -rn keurocalc/ keurocalc-0.9.4/ > without output... > > I wrote you about that, telling that I've had to apply a patch because of a > missing language in target file... > the bug was a problem with the Makefile* files in po/ directory Yes, so all in all there's _no need_ to ship a repackaged source tree, as upstream's will just work fine. Just renaming the source directory to get rid of a dpkg-source warning (or for looks) isn't sufficient grounds for repackaging, as e.g. mentioned in the REJECT-FAQ. Anyway, I've used upstream's tarball to built the package and just uploaded. Congrats to your second package in Debian (provided the DAMs agree, of course...). Cheers, Flo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature