On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 07:54:22PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 10:51:47AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 05:58:13PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 06:22:43PM -0300, Jose Carlos do Nascimento wrote: > > > > There was one policy for php libs ? > > > > And about PEAR libs ? > > > We're currently hammering something out on the debian-webapps mailing > > > list. > > Why in God's name are you doing that? The charter for debian-webapps is web > > *application* packages, not "packages implemented in PHP or providing PHP > > bindings that may or may not be used by web application packages". > I think it's because the list originally came from Bug #264069 [0] > ie: a suggestion for a php specific mailing list. > Probably also because there isn't any other place where it seems to be > happening. > I'm also not really sure where else it could belong. Uh, debian-devel would be the appropriate list for open development-related discussions that don't otherwise have an associated list. > >AFAIK, none of the comaintainers of the actual PHP packages > > are subscribed to that list. > However, the author and maintainer of dh-make-php [1] is :) That's all well and good, but a policy that doesn't have the backing of the maintainers of the engine that has to support it doesn't seem like it would be particularly useful. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature