Re: build failure on sparc
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:57:21PM +0100, Tommaso Moroni wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 02:20:42PM +0000, Steve Kemp wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:14:56PM +0100, Tommaso Moroni wrote:
> >
> > > checking for vsnprintf... yes
> > > checking for snprintf... yes
> > > checking for X... configure: error: Can't find X libraries. Please check your installation and add the correct paths!
> > > make: *** [config.status] Error 1
> > > ******************************************************************************
> > > Build finished at 20050309-0500
> > > FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > while on the other archs the package was built correctly.
> > > What's the problem?
> >
> > Does your package build-depend upon xlibs-dev?
>
> Ehm... no!
>
> I still cannot understand why it could be built on the other archs.
>
> Also, how could I find "missing" build-dep like this without wasting buildd time?
> I mean, I use pbuilder to find the minimum build-deps required for a package, and
> those specified for knights seemed enough because it compiled correctly.
> Am I missing something? (I surely am, but I cannot see where! :)
If you checked the build-deps for this particular package with
pbuilder, then they should be correct. Note, however, that the sparc
buildd may have a corrupted buildd environment, or possibly a
corrupted xfree86 package; see last months thread on -devel ("the
ongoing xfree86 buildd saga").
ianadd.
Justin
Reply to: