Re: RFS: ITA: tex4ht -- LaTeX and TeX for Hypertext (HTML)
Kapil Hari Paranjape <kapil@imsc.res.in> schrieb:
> Dear Frank,
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 12:39:46PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Kapil Hari Paranjape <kapil@imsc.res.in> schrieb:
>> > I have put up the promised newer version. The versioning scheme has
>> > reverted to YYYYMMDD.HHMM for the pre-upload period.
Some further questions/suggestions:
- I think you want to close bug #234678, but you do close #234768.
- is #219482 fixed?
- isn't #256834 fixed, too?
,----
| * Fixed some types in the html documentation.
`----
Do you mean typos?
- It is common practice to have changelog entryl like "Bumped standards
version to $foo (no changes needed)", or listing the changes.
- You should not depend only on a virtual package, gs, but rather use
something like "Depends: gs-gpl | gs". The reason is that
- I think you should remove debian/diffs...
- debian/postinst:
You create symlinks in postinst - why don't you include them in the deb?
- debian/postrm:
Why do you rm -rf /etc/tex4ht? I guess there is no consensus whether a
package may delete locally generated files in their directories upon
purge, some people say they shouldn't. I have no strong opinion, but
here it seems that it is just unnecessary - is there a specific reason
for this?
- I think it is better to set dh_compat explicitly.
- In the versions I downloaded, there are still lintian/linda warnings
about the script and the executable font files.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Reply to: