Re: Newbie question: missing conf file
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 10:27:08PM +0100, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >I take it you are upstream as well? I think the recommended way of
> >doing upstream+debian is to have the .diff include all of ./debian/,
> >such that other distros don't have to deal with it. Also, that way
> >you can do a Debian update without an upstream update.
> Yes, I'm author and Debian packager (Gentoo and PLD/Fedora in that matter,
> too). Removing debian/ from mainstream is a requirement or a suggestion?
A suggestion (maybe: recommendation:).
> >I notice that your .diff looks backwards though..do I misunderstand?
> I'm not sure what do you mean. As mainstream already contains all dibbler
> stuff, the only thing that needs to be changes is path substitution. After
> that dpkg-buildpagage -rfakeroot generates everything, including .diff.
> Do I make something wrong?
Well, if I'm reading the diff correctly (and I may not be):
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
Doesn't that mean that dibler-client.conffiles is having that line
removed from it (when you apply this diff)? I guess it doesn't
matter, and I am probably just overthinking it, since you intend to
include ./debian/ in the upstream package. Then, this diff is