[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: two question refarding a package I am adopting



On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 12:18:24AM -0500, Jereme Corrado wrote:
> Sven Mueller wrote:
> > Jereme Corrado wrote on 07/01/2005 21:34:
> > >	And my second question... The new version, (1.5.4) ships with
> > >	a little web interface...
> > 
> > Well, I don't know how tightly the web interface is linked (not in the 
> > ld.so sense, but interface-wise) to the actual program. But I could 
> > imagine two packages: The program itself including the templates in one 
> > package and the web interface in another package (which would depend on 
> > the program obviously and on a webserver).
> 
> 
> The more I look at it, the web part is really ancillary, it even
> mentions that it is for the purpose of "test driving" disc-cover.
> Should I just omit it all together?  I can certainly drop it in
> another package but it's VERY small, two file, about 400 lines of
> perl.  I am starting to see why the old package chose to omit it
> entirely.  Your thoughts?
Stick it in /usr/share/, probably /usr/share/doc/disc-cover/examples/
or such.

Justin



Reply to: