Re: RFS: aespipe
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 06:49:07PM +0000, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> I can see the point of having this utility. But can't it be merged
> into the 'loop-aes-utils' package? Why would users want one but not
> the other?
Some users may want to use aespipe without loop-AES due to its support
for seeding and iteration count. Someone who just wants to access an
encrypted backup from another machine also doesn't need the patched mount
utils from loop-aes-utls.
Cheers
Max
--
Max Vozeler <max@hinterhof.net> http://hinterhof.net/~max
GnuPG B7CDA2DC : 308E 81E7 B979 63BC A0E6 ED88 9D5B D511 B7CD A2DC
Reply to: