Re: RFS: fig2sxd

[Alexander Bürger <buerger@iskp.uni-bonn.de>]

Hi,

> Argh. This is just plainly _wrong_. Read policy and developers reference
> about versioning what -2.1 actually means...

I'm sorry, but I cannot find anything negative about 2.1 as debian
revision. In the policy I read section 5.6.11 which tells me that 2<=2.1
which is what I want; my upstream version did not change and the change is
really minor (just re-created .dsc, .diff.gz, .deb and .changes without
any change to the debian/ directory except changelog). I also checked that
my interpretation of 2<=2.1 is shared by dpkg:

dpkg --compare-versions 0.10-2 "<=" 0.10-2.1 && echo "lt"

says "lt" to me. Please tell me what is wrong, and where I can find that
info.

Thanks,

Alexander