[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: libxml-libxml-perl etc. to fix libxml-filter-xslt-perl FTBFS



On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 12:29:14AM -0800, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
> I could use an upload sponsor for these packages, preferably before 
> libxml-filter-xslt-perl is removed from unstable due to FTBFS:
> 
> libxml-libxml-perl (I am maintainer; this will be my second upload, and 
> contains a major overhaul of the XSUB code)

On powerpc, 'make test' fails:

t/02parse...........NOK 454# Failed test 454 in t/02parse.t at line 681
#  t/02parse.t line 681 is:     ok( $@ =~ /^:0:/ );
t/02parse...........FAILED test 454
        Failed 1/460 tests, 99.78% okay

t/11memory..........skipped
        all skipped: no reason given

t/26schema..........ok 2/6Element has no name nor ref
Facet pattern has no value
Element has no name nor ref
t/26schema..........dubious
        Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
DIED. FAILED tests 3-6
        Failed 4/6 tests, 33.33% okay
Failed Test  Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/02parse.t               460    1   0.22%  454
t/26schema.t  255 65280     6    8 133.33%  3-6
1 test skipped.
Failed 2/24 test scripts, 91.67% okay. 5/1079 subtests failed, 99.54% okay.

Are these architecture-specific or not? Do you need help in
investigating them?

> libxml-sax-writer-perl (orphaned; I would like to adopt; the one outstanding 
> bug is fixed in this rev) 
> 
> libxml-libxslt-perl (orphaned; I would like to adopt; undoes NMU workaround 
> for a bug that was really in libxml-libxml-perl) 
> 
> libxml-filter-xslt-perl (orphaned; I would like to adopt; about to be removed 
> from sid due to FTBFS, which was mostly the fault of libxml-libxml-perl) 

These are all marked ITA by Jay Bonci (cced). Have you confirmed with
him that he's OK with you taking them?

That said, the ITA was several months ago ...

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]



Reply to: