Re: (2nd try) RFS: Erudite Directory Service Admin
On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 22:07 -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 21:25 -0500, Mark Roach wrote:
> > These are native packages i.e. The debian packaging info is part of the
> > upstream tarball (I am the author). It is my understanding that since
> > there is no difference between upstream and packaged versions no diff is
> > necessary... isn't this right?
> Right, I didn't figured out because of the version in the package: When
> dealing with native packages, there is no need for adding a Debian
> revision, so your versions should look like 0.1, instead of a «common»
> 0.1-1 or so.
Ahh, this makes sense. I have dropped it. (0.8.1 is in my repository
> Building the package on a pbuilder environment brings this error:
> checking for X... no
> checking for gconftool-2... no
> configure: error: gconftool-2 executable not found in your path - should
> be installed with GConf
> make: *** [config.status] Error 1
> pbuilder: Failed autobuilding of package
> You should just need to build-depend on gconf2.
Whoops, I'm not actually using gconf at the moment. I removed it from
> And just a personal note. If there is not previous release of edsadmin
> in the Debian archive why list them on changelog.Debian.gz?
That seems sensible. Thanks very much for taking the time to look at