[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: How to get package in main with the same version to upgrade over a mentors.debian.net version?



On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 09:19:43PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 08:48:55PM +0200, Remco Seesink wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I am preparing an updated package with an unsolved security bug.
> > I would like to upload it to mentors.debian.net, but when it
> > gets uploaded to main it will have the same version number as the
> > one on mentors. I would to know if there is a way to upload to
> > mentors and be sure it gets upgraded when it enters main.
> > 
> > I had this problem before, but now it is worse because of the security
> > bug.
> > 
> > I looked at the policy and the reverse problem seems to be solved
> > by using epochs. An negative epoch is not the way right? And how do
> > I apply an epoch? Yada complains when I try to put an Version: field 
> > somewhere.
> > 
> > Is there an other way to do it without having to bump the debian version?
> > Or is that exactly what I should do?
> 
> The proper way is to simply not upload to mentors.d.n with 'official'
> debian revision numbers. Assuming the offical version will be 1.0-1, use
> for example 1.0-1~mentors1 (if mentors.d.n accepts ~ in version
> numbers), or alternatively 1.0-0mentors1 (decrease debian-revision by
> one, append a mentor-specific part).

Gee, I real need to find back that document that wrote to use

 1.0-0.1, 1.0-0.2, 1.0-0.3 etc for non official debian packages.




> 
> This way, there is never a clash, you can see from the version number
> it's an unoffical version.
> 
> Two alternative approaches:
> - simply increment debian revision, and use -v appropriately, it doesn't
>   matter certain debian-revisions are never uploaded. Disadvantage:
>   changelog cluttering, usually people won't have those unofficial
>   intermediate versions, and the differences among those are not very
>   interesting usually. If you merge the topmost changelog entry every
>   time, you seemingly have gaps in version numbering according to
>   changelog, not very nice either.
> - Don't care about m.d.n, simply have your fixed version uploaded with
>   the same version number. m.d.n is unoffical anyway, you in no way have
>   to take care of proper upgrade paths at all. Disadvantage: in
>   bugreports with reportbug, and for the user itself, it's hard to see
>   whether the user/reporter has an unoffical version, or the official
>   one.
> 
> --Jeroen
> 
> -- 
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar
> Jeroen@wolffelaar.nl (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
> http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl


Cheers
Geert Stappers

Attachment: pgpF7Sx7wETzX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: