Re: DD packages overview vs bugs
* GCS (gcs@lsc.hu) [040425 22:40]:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 11:35:37AM +0200, Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> wrote:
> > [...], after merkel is unrestricted (or more correct: after I'm
> > able to login to merkel again), I'll add an extra script that
> > transfers this data via another way from spohr to merkel if login is
> > restricted (slowing the transfer a bit down, and only every three
> > hours, and causing more traffic than rsync).
> Have you changed it? It's working again, thanks anyway.
Martin and I implemented a work-around that's ugly enough that I'm not
telling it here. ;)
> Well, I think I got a bad moment of
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kernel-patch-2.4-grsecurity.html
> as it says conflicting facts:
> - "Problems: # The package has not yet entered testing even though the
> 5-day delay is over. Check why." Clicking on it, I get a message that
> the most recent version of it in testing.
> - Also "Testing Status: 5 days old (needed 5 days) Valid candidate" (not
> 'going in today' message)
> - "Other available versions" shows the old version in testing.
>
> I am sure it will be all right when the page is re-created next time,
> but one may sync the events in time, so differences do not happen like
> this.
Hm, I can't say anything to this, because packages.qa and qa are two
different programs. I think it really should have shown suppressed the
first warning if it goes in on the same day. Well, about the testing
version on that page: I can tell you nothing about, sorry.
Please be aware that packages.qa can also be stalled these days. IIRC
some of the data is created by my "normal" user account on merkel, and
this account is just de-activated now (as all normal accounts on merkel).
(I also can't take a look, because my account is de-activated there.)
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Reply to: