Re: RFS: fastdep
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 05:15:09PM +0200, Geert Stappers <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > ok fixed. but neither  nor the policy says anything about that, just
> > about the short description, perhaps it needs updating...
> patches are welcome...
Strange, I have read it from the short and long descriptions as well.
So I think somewhere it's noted that neither the long description should
start with the package name...
> Use 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 ectera. (sorry I have no URL where I red that)
Only for sponsor checking right? No package should go into the pool
with x.y as Debian version, it's for NMU.