Re: RFS: fastdep
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 04:57:20PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 03:21:06PM +0200, GCS wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 03:35:49PM +0200, Robert Lemmen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > what exactly don't you like about the description? i checked it and
> > > think its fine...
> > Usually people asked not to start the description with the package name;
> > "Efficiently ..." would be just fine. Please read .
> ok fixed. but neither  nor the policy says anything about that, just
> about the short description, perhaps it needs updating...
patches are welcome...
> > > i did a -2 version with the fixes and put it at
> > You don't have to increase the Debian version I think; but it's not a
> > problem.
> better safe than sorry. i made a -3 with the updated description
> available at http://www.semistable.com/files, please have a look.
neither -1 nor -2 went into Debian archive,
there is no reason to start with -3 as the first one in the archive.
Use 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 ectera. (sorry I have no URL where I red that)