On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 05:41:13PM -0400, Michael Biebl wrote: >The author of lksctp calls his project "lksctp" but he packaged the >sourcecode as "lksctp-tools-1.0.0.tar.gz". Rename lksctp-tools-1.0.0.tar.gz to lksctp_1.0.0.orig.tar.gz (note the '_' and the '.orig') and dh_make will use the name that you want. >So dh_make proposed to call the package "lksctp-tools". I then went on >and split off the library and the development files and called them >"libsctp1" and "libsctp-dev" as I tried to adhere to the debian naming >policy. I put the remaining doc files in the package "lksctp-tools-doc" > >Now I think it's more reasonable to rename "lksctp-tools" to "lksctp" >and "lksctp-tools-doc" to "lksctp-doc" although it doesn't reflect the >tarball name anymore. In debian/copyright state the full URL (including lksctp-tools-1.0.0.tar.gz) from where it was downloded. >I would also rather change the entries in >debian/changelog and the Source field in debian/control to lksctp. > >Do you also think this sounds more reasonable? It sounds good to me. >As soon as this point is clarified I will retitle the aforementioned bug >and then hope to find a sponsor for this imho interesting package. > >Best regards, >Michael Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux | Building 28C : :' : Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia `. `' http://debian.org/ | http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/ `- |
Attachment:
pgpKlVHsFaqmS.pgp
Description: PGP signature