Re: RFS: scribus
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 11:28:47AM -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote:
> * Frank Lichtenheld <email@example.com> [2004-02-20 17:00:58 +0100]:
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:05:15AM -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm looking for a sponsor for uploading updated packages of scribus -
> > I may be interested to sponsor this, but I will take a look at
> > the packages first.
> Great. Please do.
debian/control: You changed many (build) dependencies from 1.1.4 to 1.1.5.
Could you explain why? And perhaps include that explanation in the changelog?
debian/changelog: The newest changelog entry needs adjustment obviously
(Debian version missing, it's not a NMU). You also doesn't have any
closes: #bugnr in your entries. Isn't any of the bugs of scribus fixed
in these new upstream versions?
debian/rules: please add a link from /usr/share/doc/scribus to
/usr/lib/scribus/doc/en/ (and consider adding a doc-base file)
debian/scribus.menu: needs=X11 -> needs="X11" (will be a warning with
debian/rules: There are many commented lines. Perhaps some off them
are obsolete and can be deleted?) It makes the file more readable.
debian/scribus.1: I think there is still some work needed on that,
but we can discuss this later
Taste questions aka MHO:
debian/changelog: I think
+ change 1
+ change 2
is far more readable then
* debian/control: change 1
* debian/control: change 2
but after all, its your changelog...
Aside from the issues mentioned above, the package seems to work fine.
Frank Lichtenheld <firstname.lastname@example.org>