[snips:] Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > > How can this be? Could the reporter have been using a non-debian > > package? Current upstream is 2.717. > sure, for example by using unofficial repository or by building the > package using debian/ directory sometimes bundled with upstream > source (eg. mplayer) Should the reporter be filing bugs against "debian" packages when they were not distributed by debian? That would make QA pretty difficult :) > > I would also like to know which version of CGI.pm is installed on > > their machine. > this question suggests me that faqomatic (reporter version, not in debian) > doesn't depend on libcgi-pm-perl The faqomatic package IN debian does not specify libcgi-pm-perl as a dependency though it definately uses the CGI.pm module. I will check the policy manual tomrrow when my head is clearer, (long, long day) Perhaps the dependencies should be adjusted, it woudl seem so... Thanks for your help, I would love to hear thoughts on my first, (new) question. thanks, jereme -- +--------------------------------------------------------------+ Jereme Corrado <jereme@restorative-management.com> System Administrator Restorative Management Corp. gpg: 1024D/9C39E1F0
Attachment:
pgpUjpaaQb5Ev.pgp
Description: PGP signature