Re: Conflicts: foo (>=x && <=y) - how?
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 12:41:20PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On a sidenote I wonder whether I should actually bother with this. -
> The version in woody and the versions currently available in sid and
> sarge are ok, 1:4.0.3-9 was uploaded almost half a year ago (20 Aug
> 2003), is it necessary to carter for completely outdated sid and
> sarge?
I wouldn't bother. I don't think dependency relationships are necessary
to work around bugs in other packages, unless there are strong practical
reasons for it. You could create a postinst check with a more verbose
warning if there's some serious practical problem.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: